Evidence trail: analysis report

C120 Release 6 Video Corpus Triage

All 16 MP4 files received a six-state raw survey. Fifteen contain visual encounter or historical film material; one carries Ruppelt's audio presentation. The survey supports a release-wide allocation of attention, not a claim that every frame or audio passage was examined.

Open this source in the research viewer Open source file

Answer First

All 16 MP4 files received a six-state raw survey. Fifteen contain visual encounter or historical film material; one carries Ruppelt's audio presentation. The survey supports a release-wide allocation of attention, not a claim that every frame or audio passage was examined.

Source details

Media type
analysis report
Archive path
Release_6/Analysis/C120-Release-6-Video-Corpus-Triage.md
Last updated
2026-09-19
Source file
Open source file

Source Summary

UAPs.world keeps this analysis report connected to its original source path, release context, and related analysis path so readers can inspect the evidence trail directly.

Analysis report summary

This analysis page exposes the report substance directly for readers and crawlers, while the research viewer remains the place for source inspection, frame review, and follow-up work.

Source Basis

The table accounts for every audiovisual catalog record. Samples are at 3%, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80% and 97% of each released file. These source-derived sheets apply no contrast enhancement. Exact sampled timestamps are linked below, and each sheet preserves its frame labels. Sparse sampling can miss brief events, especially in the 15-minute Colorado recording; a hold is not a finding that no event exists anywhere in the clip. A strict physical-motion promotion requires persistence, sufficient duration, correspondence to stable scene features and a distinct analytical role. PR133, PR135 and PR143 earn bounded close-up tests because their raw features persist and answer different questions. None supplies a...

Observation

### Complete Audiovisual Ledger

Working Assessment

The disclosure-forward neutrality gate keeps extraordinary explanations available only as source-specific hypotheses. Ordinary optics, tracking, background changes, birds, aircraft and balloons remain controls. No enhancement-only feature is used, and no native-frame kinematics or physical classification is claimed. Independent registered trajectories and calibrated telemetry would upgrade the assessment; a reproducible conventional match would weaken an extraordinary interpretation.

Cited public sources

Analysis of this record

These UAPs.world reports cite this record. Read their findings and evidence limits, or inspect the cited material in the research viewer.

Public Field Desk

Classify this source for 2 points, mark useful or misleading records for 1 point, or submit observations for curator review. Public contribution points progress through Observer, Analyst I, Analyst II, Case Builder, and Archivist and can unlock field desk themes.

Open this source in the research viewer Browse related analysis report items Open analysis desk